Safety first
- Share via
Re “Your money or your life,” Opinion, Feb. 1
Thank you for a clear and unbiased explanation of the controversy around cost-benefit analysis. Government should undertake analysis of cost versus risk in deciding how to spend tax dollars for public safety. But I think where many of us have a problem is in the attempt to quantify the unquantifiable.
For example, I suspect Metrolink used some type of cost-benefit analysis in deciding not to install a costly crash-avoidance system in its trains. But it appears unlikely that it quantified the risk of an engineer text-messaging while at the controls.
The deaths of people who probably never suspected they were on a public rail system without a crash-avoidance system are unacceptable. Very high value should be placed on public expectation of safety where passengers put their faith in systems beyond their control.
Carl Allender
Glendale
More to Read
Sign up for The Wild
We’ll help you find the best places to hike, bike and run, as well as the perfect silent spots for meditation and yoga.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.