Firefighters Put Heat on Residents Failing to Cut Brush, Trees
- Share via
Fire season was declared early this dry spring.
County firefighters are coming around sooner than usual too, strongly suggesting that residents not only haul off dry brush and dead timber from around their homes, but prune or remove beloved pine trees, cut back the bougainvillea, and generally take more precautions than ever to protect their homes from wildfire.
They are being given 30 days to perform the work or face a $200 administrative penalty, an additional $231 abatement enforcement fee, and perhaps hundreds of dollars more if the county has to come out and do the dirty work. If the homeowner is really stubborn, the district attorney could always file some misdemeanor charges.
The firefighters put it more gently, of course, but that, in a nutshell, is the message.
“No question, people here love the firemen,” said Topanga resident Rosi Dagit. “But this set off a lot of bad feelings.”
In fact, the howl over pruning back trees grew so loud that fire officials extended the deadline only for trimming back trees until this fall, even though that will be after the fire season ends.
*
Nearly four years after the Topanga-Malibu brush fire destroyed 323 homes and 112 other structures in the Santa Monica Mountains, and after another fire claimed six homes last fall, fire officials are stepping up enforcement of brush abatement rules throughout Los Angeles County.
Armed with new, more detailed regulations and “monetary incentives for self-compliance”--more commonly known as fines--they are trying harder than ever to fireproof those parts of the county where urban sprawl meets acres and acres of parched chaparral.
For the sake of residents and firefighters alike.
“I don’t blame the firemen,” said Dagit, a 10-year canyon resident whose home is in the densely wooded Fernwood section of Topanga and covered with bougainvillea. “I wouldn’t want to come in here either” during a fire, she said.
As more and more harried Angelenos have sought respite in the lush foothills and canyons that crease the county, the issue of what fire officials call “urban-interface fire safety” has grown increasingly salient. And regulations requiring the removal of brush, trees and other fire fuels from around homes have been growing more stringent.
The devastating 1993 fires convinced officials that more was needed to be done.
Last year, a county brush clearance office was set up to coordinate abatement efforts. Then, this January, stricter codes went into effect.
It used to be that only natives had to be trimmed back from buildings to prevent the rapid spread of fire; ornamental vegetation was omitted from the clearance requirements. Now, even decorative plants are among the flora that are subject to restrictions in height, spacing, and proximity to structures. The new regulations are a complicated web of measurements that vary according to the type of plant, size of plant, the plant’s position on a slope and whether it burns easily (such as eucalyptus) or is flame resistant (such as succulents).
The start of fire season depends on location. It can be as early as April or May in the High Desert, and as late as July in the coastal regions. This year, however, no matter where you live, fire season is starting a month early because of the winter’s short rainy season.
And firefighters, newly trained in the stricter rules, have been trying to crack down.
“In the past, [we] kind of let it go,” said Battalion Chief Glenn Mutch, who oversees the brush-lined, tree-filled canyons and plateaus from Malibu to Calabasas. “You feel uncomfortable telling somebody to take out something they care for, like a live tree. [But] we knew this was something that needed to change.”
In 1996, 33,000 land parcels were initially declared unsafe, their owners receiving notices to perform cleanup, said Assistant Fire Chief Michael Wilkinson, who oversees the brush clearance office. But after follow-up inspections, 1,800 had not mitigated the problems.
Officials say one of the primary reasons so few homes were lost in last year’s Calabasas fire was that many residents had followed brush removal recommendations.
“A home has a 94% greater chance of surviving a wildfire with good brush clearance,” said county fire Capt. Steve Valenzuela.
This year, with the extra efforts being made, more than 35,000 properties have been declared unsafe. But early indications are that an even higher percentage of residents are taking care of the problem themselves.
What irked residents in the tree-loving community of Topanga, and other parts of the county, was the department’s recommendation that live trees be pruned or removed entirely.
In one section of the canyon, of the 300-plus parcels that were inspected, 290 were asked to remove trees, several residents said.
“We had many people calling us and saying, ‘I want to do what’s right but I can’t afford it’,” said Susan Nissman, a field deputy for county Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky.
At a town hall meeting this month in Topanga, disgruntled residents also pointed out that pruning in hot weather can damage or kill the tree.
Fire officials agreed to allow residents to wait for cooler weather to begin pruning their trees, even though fire season will come and go in the interim.
They also want to make clear that they are flexible.
“We’ve always felt that compliance was the key,” Wilkinson said. “We don’t want to go in there with a [cleanup] crew.”
And, he added, they don’t much like writing citations.
Michael Georgiades, a 27-year Topanga resident, saw no reason to postpone the grueling duty or argue about time limits. He has spent several days removing half a dozen acacia trees, dry brush, poison sumac and poison oak--which left him itching.
“We all live up here because it’s a unique lifestyle,” the songwriter said. “There’s a price for everything. This is a price I don’t mind paying.”
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.